DJI: New products at IFA 2023
DJI is another manufacturer that will be represented at IFA 2023. Here is a compact overview of the products that DJI had in its luggage.
For the first time since 2019, DJI has a booth at the IFA. There they are not only showing a new all-rounder drone, the Air 3, but also the Osmo Action 4 and the DJI Avata including DJI Goggles 2. Below you will find the most important details about these products.
Jump to section
DJI OsmoAction 4
The DJI OsmoAction 4 is the latest action camera in the camera equipment manufacturer's range. It is waterproof up to 18 meters and is even capable of recording at a temperature of -20 degrees Celsius for up to one and a half hours. It does this with a maximum resolution of 4K at 120 images pro Second. A 1/1,3-inch image sensor with f/2.8 is installed.
The DJI Osmo Action 4 is available now at a starting price of 429 euros.
DJI Air 3
The new Air 3 comes with two cameras, which take pictures with 48 megapixels and videos with a 4K resolution at 60 pictures pro record second. One sensor has a wide angle and the other is a telephoto camera with triple zoom. The flight time is 46 minutes in optimal conditions and mild temperatures.
The DJI Air 3 will be sold immediately. The price for the cheapest bundle is 1.099 euros.
DJI Avata and Goggles 2
The DJI Avatar is another drone in the portfolio that is designed to score points with its lightness and maneuverability. That is why it also has an integrated propeller guard, an emergency brake and an obstacle avoidance on the underside. The drone also records videos in 4K and 60 frames pro second with a field of view of 155 degrees.
Matching the avata were the Goggles 2 These are connected to the drone and show everything that the cameras see on two 1080p displays. The video is streamed via WLAN and the DLNA protocol.
The DJI Avata is now available for at least 1.269 euros, although the bundle with the Goggles 2 is a little more expensive. Alternatively, these are available separately for 849 euros.
The announcement that the battery would contain 46 hours is not correct and should read 46 minutes ideally and in mild temperatures.
Hi, it is of course clear that the unit of time was wrong and I corrected it. In my opinion, the thing about the mild temperatures was already included in the formulation, but has now been written out for greater clarity.
Regards
David H from TechnikNews