Google Fonts: “Data protection lawyer” and client Eva Z. in close relationship?
from David Wurm 
on August 24, 2022, 18:02 pm | Write a comment
The attention to the cause of the Google Fonts warning wave never ends. We now have information that could present the case very differently. The client Eva Z. and the "data protection lawyer" Mag. Marcus Hohenecker are said to have a closer relationship to each other.
We had reported – the lawyer represents his client in a case where she is said to have suffered “discomfort” from accessing websites with embedded Google fonts. The affected website operator is now suing for a data protection violation that their personal data (IP address) has been forwarded to servers in the USA. If you agree to a "comparison" of 190 euros instead, the matter is settled. We received information from an acquaintance of the "client" Eva Z. and Mr. Hohenecker, which could allow the case to be presented in a completely different way.
At this point we expressly point out that in the current case the presumption of innocence applies to all parties involved.
In this article we have summarized in detail how the affected operator should proceed, what inconsistencies there are in this case and what experts say:
Cause Google Fonts: AMSProgramming course and legal know-how
In this duo, with her as a client with IT knowledge and the lawyer for the legal implementation of the letters, the idea of the warning wave could be born. As a former friend of the woman tells us, Eva Z. is said to have been unemployed for several months and for more than a year Prohave attended a programming course at AWS. Hohenecker could have supplemented the legal skills as a lawyer as a “data protection lawyer” in this case. Both should be in a close personal relationship with each other.
This could be an indication that a list of websites could be visited automatically with the help of a bot, scanned and then the website operators could be reminded in writing. It is the presumption of innocence.
According to the acquaintance, the client Eva Z. should definitely exist in this form. It should therefore not be a synonym or a fake person.
More information will follow.
